الاثنين، 19 مايو 2008

صور خفيفة (فقط فى اليابان)





تنويه هام

البعض يواجه مشكلة فى ارسال تعليقات لانه يجد مطلوبا ان يكون له حساب على جوجل ولتفادى ذلك اختر (غير معرف ) واضغط عليها وبذلك سترسل تعليقك بسهولة جدا بدون عوائق فقط اكتب امضائك فى نفس مربع التعليق

الأحد، 18 مايو 2008

زيادات شهر يونيو

Freight surcharges for container shipping between Europe and the Far Eastare set by Far Eastern Freight Conference (FEFC). :
JUNE:
BAF: 546.00 USD per TEU
CAF: +18.2%
High Cube Premium:
USD 350 per container effective 15 June 2004 to Mediterranean
War Risk:
To/From Syria :USD 24 per TEU until further notice
To/From Lebanon :USD 50 per TEU until further notice
To/From Egypt :USD 0 per TEU until further notice
Peak Season Surcharge (PSS) From Asia (Excluding Japan) :
From Asia (excluding Japan) to the Mediterranean USD 158 per TEU for the period 1st June 2008 to 17th October 2008
Europe — Middle East
Freight surcharges for container shipping between Europe and the Middle East are set by
India Pakistan Bangladesh Ceylon Conference (IPBCC).
JUNE:
BAF: 370.00 USD per TEU
CAF: +20.64%

اكبر سفينة شحن فى العالم


Emma Mærsk is the world’s largest containership

The A.P. Møller Corporation’s new giant containership was christened Emma Mærsk – named after Mærsk McKinney Møller’s recently deceased wife Emma.
The shipyard’s former chairman of the board, the 93-year-old Mærsk McKinney Møller, was also present at the christening, writes Børsen.
Emma Mærsk beats all former containerships by 10 per cent with regards to the number of carriers loading 20 feet containers (teu). Emma Mærsk is 400 m long and the motor yields 110,000 hp.
It will be possible to carry approximately 11,000 containers all over the world the world onboard Emma Mærsk, which by some experts is said to be able to carry up to 13,000 containers with the proper load technique.
In several ways the enormous construction is ground-breaking. For example, silicone painting covers the hull below the waterline, which reduces the water resistance and the ship’s fuel consumption by 1,200 ton annually
.

Hapag Lloyd moves to Port of Liverpool building

SHIPPING giant Hapag-Lloyd is relocating its Liverpool staff into a single city centre location. Around 60 staff are currently located across two sites – India Building and the Royal Liver building – are moving to a new home in the Grade II Listed Port of Liverpool Building. Hapag, one of the top five shipping companies in the world, has awarded the £300,000 contract for the design and fit-out to Warrington-based Claremont. The new office will include meeting rooms, an open-plan area for 60 people, new partitions, power, data and IT installations and a new breakout facility and communications room. The project will take eight weeks to complete.Claremont will be working alongside the current landlord to ensure the new scheme remains in keeping with the building’s ongoing refurbishment plans and the landmark’s architectural features.

Evergreen and COSCON to offer seperate China/Persian Gulf services


Evergreen and COSCON have announced that each is to launch a weekly independent service covering the China/Arabian Persian Gulf route beginning early June 2008. The new services replace the current CPG service jointly operated by the two container lines. The move is said to be the result of increased customer demand on the route. COSCON is to deploy five 3400teu vessels into China and Persian Gulf service (CPG1) with the rotation as Shanghai - NingboYantian - Singapore - Jebel Ali - Banda Abbas - Karachi - Singapore - Shanghai. Evergreen will deploy six vessels of identical size into China and Arabian Persian Gulf service (CPG2) with the rotation: Qingdao - ShanghaiNingbo - Yantian - Hong Kong - Tanjung Pelepas - Jebel Ali - Dammam - Nhava Sheva - Singapore - Kaohsiung - Qingdao. Evergreen has said that it intends to maintain cooperation with COSCON in this trade lane through the slot swap arrangement.
SeatradeAsia Online

Evergreen chairman given Belgian Royal


Evergreen chairman given Belgian Royal ...
On May 13th 2008 Evergreen Group Chairman Dr Chang Yung-Fa was presented the honour of Commandeur de l'Ordre de la Couronne (Commander of Order of the Crown) by the Belgian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Karel De Gucht, The presentation was made on behalf of His Majesty King Albert II and took place at a ceremony held in the Palais d'Egmont in Brussels.The award for Dr. Chang was conferred in recognition of his achievements, contributions and innovations in international transportation and trade. He is one of only a few non-Belgian individuals to be so recognised.Evergreen's links with Belgium date back almost 30 years to when Evergreen launched its first service to Northern Europe. The Belgian port of Antwerp was a key call on the schedule and has remained a cornerstone of Evergreen's global services. Today, Evergreen vessels call at two Belgian ports, Antwerp and Zeebrugge.

حادثة مركب MSC


MSC NAPOLI report uncovers design flawMAIB reports on MSC NAPOLI incident...
During the morning of 18 January 2007, when on passage in the English Channel, the 4419 TEU container ship MSC Napoli encountered heavy seas, causing the ship to pitch heavily. The ship was making good a speed of 11 knots and the height of the waves was up to 9m. At about 1105, the vessel suffered a catastrophic failure of her hull in way of her engine room. The master quickly assessed the seriousness of the situation and decided to abandon ship. Following the broadcast of a distress call at 1125, the 26 crew abandoned the vessel in an enclosed lifeboat. They were later recovered by two Royal Navy helicopters. There were no injuries.MSC Napoli was subsequently taken under tow towards Portland, UK but, as the disabled vessel approached the English coast, it became evident there was a severe risk she might break up or sink, and she was intentionally beached in Branscombe Bay on 20 January 2007.A number of containers were lost overboard when the vessel listed heavily after beaching.The investigation has identified a number of factors which contributed to the failure of the hull structure, including:• The vessel’s hull did not have sufficient buckling strength in way of the engine room.• The classification rules applicable at the time of the vessel’s construction did not require buckling strength calculations to be undertaken beyond the vessel’s amidships area.• There was no, or insufficient, safety margin between the hull’s design loading and its ultimate strength.• The load on the hull was likely to have been increased by whipping effect.• The ship’s speed was not reduced sufficiently in the heavy seas